In the modern world, the issue of environmental degradation has been evolved as a heated topic of controversy. It is suggested that people should lead a simpler lives to mitigate environmental pollution. As i refute the effectiveness of this notion, i am convinced that technology is a more crucial key to tackling environmental issue.
On the one hand, some people believe that enjoying life with the use of less sophisticated technology could reduce the adverse effects on environmental problems. First of all, restricting the use of high- tech applications which consumes electricity can lead to a more environmentally friendly lifestyle. For example, most greenhouse gases emissions which stem from the overuse of electronic devices including televisions, air- conditioners and refrigerators could be controlled if the users limit their dependence on them. Moreover, people now have a tendency of using all types of poisonous chemicals and pesticides for their farming. It is beneficial for the environment if farmers use organic manure. Despite the fact that those chemicals after being processed by machines could be convenient and easy to stimulate the plants to grow, they could pollute not only the soil but also the water distribution.
On the other hand, i personally believe that technology is more plausible in impeding environmental contamination. First, technology can generate electricity from alternative resources, which raises the prospect of a renewable energy era. If solar or wind power is fully developed, people will halt the consumption of non- renewable energy supply like coals or fuels. Besides that, advanced technology in production could reduce the massive amount of exhaust fumes emitted by factories. For instance, the installation of modern recycling systems could guarantee that industrial waste would be treated properly, which would safeguard water and soil resources.
In conclusion, although living simpler lives could probably contribute the resolution of environmental issues, i am firmly of the view that technology should be highlighted as the key answer for these problems.
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 89
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress. What do you think are the cause of this? Can you suggest some possible solution? 73
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year between high school and university in order to do charitable work abroad in underdeveloped countries. What are the advantages and disadvantages for young people of doing volunteer work? 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 61
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heared everywhere nowadays?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...to mitigate environmental pollution. As i refute the effectiveness of this notion...
^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...efute the effectiveness of this notion, i am convinced that technology is a more ...
^
Line 2, column 797, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ocessed by machines could be convenient and and easy to stimulate the plants to grow, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the resolution of environmental issues, i am firmly of the view that technology s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59133126935 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19615323907 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1036992483 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236067167365 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798418785207 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894023239568 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164217798821 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070389331743 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.