do you agree with objection to skyscrapers?
I personally agree that the development of tall building in city should be deducted. This density can cause hazard either in community or corporeal.
From time to time, the human population was sharply rised up and it takes employment and housing for society. In this millenial era, many big company constructed in big town that resulting in density and reduced land area. The entrepreneurs and world investors plan a skyscrapers development that can overcome economics and geographical problems. The existence of skyscrapers, it will be more affordable because of the close access from location to destination.
The otherside of constructing to many skyscrapers can also cause imbalances. It triggers many people urbanized to the town and it will experience and insurmountable density. The communities that live and work in skyscrapers tend to be less healthy because of the reduced green open space and it alse cause flooding effects due to less water catchment areas. In social aspects of humans tend to trigger the emergence of individualism because of the lack of wider socialization with outsider.
The construction of building should be decreased in order to prevent city denseness. The development of skyscrapers can control the problem of economical and geographical of the town but it also caused human become unhealhty because of the lack of green open space.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skyscrapers'' or 'skyscraper's'?
Suggestion: skyscrapers'; skyscraper's
...ntrepreneurs and world investors plan a skyscrapers development that can overcome economics...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...access from location to destination. The otherside of constructing to many skysc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33027522936 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10923914594 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55504587156 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1801050303 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 7.06120827912 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086622091601 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030998328627 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321703534434 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518758467279 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203533283078 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.