It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Personally, I am disagree that the popularity of tradition cultures was decreased because of modern technology. Both are very essential for community, cultures have a lot of elements of life and technology is very necessary for human being life.
In present-day, technology development is rising up rapidly, abound of application and any other electro was emerge that establish with high capability. As time goes by, the way people think is fascinating incredible for the convenience and progress of society. One of the example, GPS (Global Positioning System) application is very advantageous dan effective for journey. In this modern era, people do not concern of getting lost,
because GPS can show the direction that is transmitted through satellite. GPS can provide accurate information for the chauffeur and they can drive peaceful and stable.
Traditional culture was an element with a lot of sense and build up human being relationship. Culture has been embedded in everyone and inherited from generation to generation. For example, in the 21st century, parents give their children a gadget that can approach everything through the internet. The gadget is a very effective infrastructure system for the community. However, technology triggers the fading culture that has been growing for a long time. One of them is generate children to be weary to read books. Read a book we can treasure out more ideas and content that the author propose into the book. The book is a world window that can enrich our imagination with varied words that have full of meanings and resources.
Increasingly sophisticated technology can threaten the loss of cultural traces if it is eliminate continuously and not culvicate. Modern applications that are rise up form us to pay more consideration to the culture around us because culture was the one that has strengthened community bonds before the advent of technology in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | tahmeed20192020 | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | Sattty | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | Sattty | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Bharat Goswami | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Cindyja | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
Personally, I am disagree that the popularity of tradition cultur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'emerged'.
Suggestion: emerged
...f application and any other electro was emerge that establish with high capability. As...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., people do not concern of getting lost, because GPS can show the direction that ...
^^^
Line 8, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eliminated'.
Suggestion: eliminated
...en the loss of cultural traces if it is eliminate continuously and not culvicate. Modern ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26948051948 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01641898974 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.512999079 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134952878325 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043386517295 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366840924875 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752711838984 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491214056317 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.