Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should invest more moneu in science education than other subjects to develop the country.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should invest more moneu in science education than other subjects to develop the country.

Every country would has tendency to raise fund for students related to science rather than other aspects because of the fact that governments strongly believe that these fields are much more essential to their country's developments. From my point of view, I think that we should invest a reasonable amount of money in all aspects.
On the one hand, education of science plays a necessary role for several reasons: first, larger expenditure kn scientific subjects boosts production, healthcare, quality, transportation and all other aspects of life, hence, science is one of the major contributors to the prosperity of a nation; secondly, investment in science education highly trains intellectual workforce to push the country forward as in fact, the talent is considered to be the most important factors for a country's development.
On the other hand, excessive focus kn education of science may make students disregard other subjects, in particular, they aren't provided with comprehensive knowledge. Next, undue attention paid to teaching science subjects creates imbalanced distribution of workforce. In other words, there has to be the shortage of labour working in non-scientific fields such as lawyers, journalists and so on.
In conclusion, governments should support every subject with amount of money on balance to develop a country's future . Therefore, they need a comprehensive understanding for a better life.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-16 cuongthkl0202 56 view
Essays by user cuongthkl0202 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
Every country would has tendency to raise fund for students rel...
^^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ed to science rather than other aspects because of the fact that governments strongly believe that these...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onable amount of money in all aspects. On the one hand, education of science pl...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt factors for a countrys development. On the other hand, excessive focus kn ed...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ard other subjects, in particular, they arent provided with comprehensive knowledge. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as lawyers, journalists and so on. In conclusion, governments should suppor...
^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... on balance to develop a countrys future . Therefore, they need a comprehensive un...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53211009174 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13520118298 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637614678899 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.992306549 49.4020404114 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.75 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.75 7.06120827912 280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255643172299 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980564639673 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605689231966 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146393790952 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00748897562751 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.