Due to a shortage of land, vertical buildings appear the norm in futuristic architecture. Do you agree or disagree?
High-rise prosperty in recent years has made a trend of erect-oriented buildings seperate all over the world and impact deeply on futuristic design. In my perspective, I totally concur on concur on this statement by some compelling reasons below.
On the one hand, vertical buildings' appearance can hand in with people to cope with many society issues which is existing in our daily life. Firstly, being built with exect acreage of ground, buildings use their height to design and make spaces for many purposes such as for offices, apartments and to name but a few instead of directly constructing on land. Hence, a great amount of prosperty can be save to resonably use for community constructions such as schools, hospitals, parks and sewer. Secondly, vertical buidings are an ideal way for engineers to design as well as illustrating their insprirations and creative minds. Finally as an result, a whole city or even a country can have organised arrangements or buildings and ground spaces, which will be stable for a long time.
According to this, human life and the environment are clearly take advantages from this kind of architecture. When apartments blocks are built, more habitats appear in form of flats and penthouses for citizens to live in. Then, people can live in more and more comfortable and convinient spaces, which can help them to improve their houshold standard. For the environment, green trees can have larger spaces to be planted and grow up as the consequence of resonable prosperty's using. Furthermore, some projects of eco-living now are in process that combine trees with flats to develop the air's quality as well as the surroundings. For example, in Vietnam, one project of apartment blocks called Solforest are being builts which each flats of the building has large enough space for planting trees with the ambition of covering the city with green and eco environment.
In conclusion, plenty of architecture are appeared to serve human life, but vertical designs are the stable architecture which not only can help people's living area but also arrange the infrastructure worldwide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'concur on'.
Suggestion: concur on
...ic design. In my perspective, I totally concur on concur on this statement by some compelling reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ons below. On the one hand, vertical buildings appearance can hand in with people to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...their insprirations and creative minds. Finally as an result, a whole city or even a co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...irations and creative minds. Finally as an result, a whole city or even a country ...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...an life and the environment are clearly take advantages from this kind of architectu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell as the surroundings. For example, in Vietnam, one project of apartment blocks...
^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lts which each flats of the building has large enough space for planting trees wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15362318841 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8691904308 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9031334561 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988603480982 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347018498797 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396326297513 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726262196037 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039943981154 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.