Earlier tehnological developments have more benefits in the lives of ordinary people than recent technology will have. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Earlier technological developments have more benefit in the lives of ordinary people than recent developments will ever have. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Although, some people believed that older forms of technology are more beneficial than the latest ones. I strongly disagree with this opinion due to the advantages the latest developments offer.
There are so many attributes to the latest technology than the old forms, the most important is availability and easy-to-operate machines across different professions so as to ease man labour and fasten production when necessary. For example, during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, China manufactured Robot to attend to patients showing symptoms to prevent contact and spread of the disease in humans.
Other attribute is the availability of multifuctional pocket friendly handsets that are readily affordable to ease communication. It can serve as radio, television, camera and different applications can be downloaded on it to ease acessibility unlike the archaic cell phone that was not durable and the only function was to make call. Infact, recent cellphones can perform same function like a computer as almost all computer applications now have version that worked perfectly on phone.
In conclusion, technology is positively impacting people in all areas of life. Despite different believe on whether or not the older technology have more benefit than the recent ones, I believe recent technology is solving many arising problems and contributing to economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | Oyebanjo Moriam Toyosi | 56 | view |
- Earlier technological developments have more benefit in the lives of ordinary people than recent developments will ever have To what extent do you agree or diagree 56
- Earlier tehnological developments have more benefits in the lives of ordinary people than recent technology will have To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat extent do you agree or disagree. Although, some people believed that older forms ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... forms of technology are more beneficial than the latest ones. I strongly disagre...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e machines across different professions so as to ease man labour and fasten production w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion, technology is positively impacting people in all areas of life. Despite dif...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...in all areas of life. Despite different believe on whether or not the older technology ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...s of life. Despite different believe on whether or not the older technology have more benefit ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58723404255 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06848346338 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621276595745 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1513597931 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411568573578 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149854387454 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18713894108 0.0667982634062 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262270976092 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.291526948808 0.056905535591 512% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.