In education and employment, some people work harder than others.
Why do some people work harder? Is it always a good thing to work hard?
In contemporary society, some people have a high responsible awareness and always work harder than others towards both education and employment. There are many forces that foster the consistency of this problem, which can be analyzed obviously. To the best of my knowledge, this phenomenon has both negative and positive effects. This essay will present an overview of causes and influences to this issue.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the mental work of each individual is widely perceived as the main reason. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the traditional education of families is able to affect the growth of people, particularly in mental responsibility at work. For example, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, the hard work of people is proportional to the promotion opportunities about a company's function. Secondly, another factor that has added fuel to the fire is the passion. In other words, the interests and favorites about career or study are accompanied by the increasing industry of people.
In evaluating its impact, it is important to take effects on individuals into account. From a personal perspective, the hard-working has resulted in the success of their life. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the industrious people are inclined to overcome adversities and regrard difficulties as opportunities for personal growth. However, the counter-argument raised by opponents is the fact that people work harder than others that creates detriment for themselves in some cases. For instance, in teamwork, if someone always does everything, it would lead to laziness and irresponsibility of other members.
In conclusion, the responsibility and the passion of people are the main reasons, which negatively and positively impacts on each person as mentioned above.
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 84
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 89
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 89
- The charts below shows the percentage of electricity used by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 89
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4295532646 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.174391069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6092020734 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332464307007 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946155202064 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122994293376 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171379786844 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076090102359 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.