Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to help employees perform better in their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The proponents of a holiday lasting at least four weeks believe such a policy will enhance labour productivity. Nevertheless, I partly agree with this school of thought due to the following explanations.
There are some reasons that explain why the supporters of this initiative claim that it will better improve the work performance of employees. Due to prolonged working days throughout the year, most staff members are reported to undergo stress and depression, detrimentally affecting their concentration during working hours and therefore reducing labour productivity. Thus, some governments have called for international actions to cut down on working days and increase the number of holidays to promote the mental health of employees in all sectors. Therefore, a yearly four-week holiday scheme may provide employees with precious chances to unwind, which can build up their motivation and energy to be more productive at work.
Nevertheless, a prolonged holiday can exert detrimental effects on the business activities of enterprises. As the number of employees needed for the management process of business activities in a company during the lengthy holiday remains low, it can suffer from a shortage of staff members if it gets an urgent order from its business partner. Due to the lack of employees, the company may have to offer a refusal to its partner, negatively impacting its reputation and production activities in the long run. For instance, as the Tet holiday in Vietnam lasts two weeks, many companies have to postpone their orders, reducing their venues during this time. As a result, some proponents of such a long holiday have asked the government to ponder shortening the holiday.
In conclusion, although some individuals claim that a four-week holiday per year may enhance labourers' performance, I partly agree with this viewpoint. As individuals experience a long holiday with numerous recreational activities, they may lose a sense of concentration and motivation at work, resulting in a fatigue state when they resume work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-19 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 75
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- In many countries the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse What do you think are the causes of this problem What measures could be taken to solve it 89
- All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve the problems 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ance labour productivity. Nevertheless, I partly agree with this school of though...
^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...year may enhance labourers performance, I partly agree with this viewpoint. As in...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42367601246 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04693282705 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8851378652 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173441896493 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635464949748 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342848205657 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104226859985 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240040085223 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.