It is an alaraming issue that environmental degradation have become more severe. In this essay I am going to talk on both the side but I strongly disagree ordinary people can also improve the damage done to environment be them because government and large companies in not only responsible for the damage to the environment. They will also improve the damage to environment but they will improve in their own path. They are equally responsible for the damage.
On the one hand, ordinary people should understand the damages done to environment because of their mistakes. The home waste they should bumb in dustbins. They should join some organization which is for awearness of environment rather than joining any rely for no reason. People so use less gadgets which is harmful to environment. For instance, people should reduce less air conditions, CFCs, use less fuel, refrigerator and so on. Hence it affect the air pollution. If you use more noisy things than it also disturbs the environment with noise pollution.
On the other side, government should make a law to protact environment from any hazardous things they should band public smoking in public and public transportation should reduce to some extent they should be limited. However, large companies should also see to it that they should not harm the environment. The waste and the fog they produce which goes in water and air. Companies should keep in mind when they through their waste in water the chemicals which joins in water harm to the Marian animals and the fog that comes from the companies that harm to air pollution. To cite an example, companies should focus on more energy and on organic things which will not harm environment.
To draw the conclusion, I would say that ordinary people should see that they maintain their surrounding clean and pollution free which do not cause any harm to environment. However, government and large companies should see that they make such things which do no cause to environment.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 56
- Some people believe that a person’s intelligence is inherited from the parents, while others believe that their environment is the main factor. Discuss these views. Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence? 67
- the environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what 39
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What measures do you think might be effective? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on both the side but I strongly disagree ordinary people can also improve the da...
^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ongly disagree ordinary people can also improve the damage done to environment b...
^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment. They will also improve the damage to environment but they will improve in ...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun gadgets is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...g any rely for no reason. People so use less gadgets which is harmful to environment...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... use less fuel, refrigerator and so on. Hence it affect the air pollution. If you use...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
... fuel, refrigerator and so on. Hence it affect the air pollution. If you use more nois...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... on. Hence it affect the air pollution. If you use more noisy things than it also ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99700598802 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68636295947 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446107784431 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3511209292 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7222222222 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61111111111 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293263010343 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104524360539 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823047868701 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203846602963 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613711356727 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.