Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
The deterioration of the environment is the main issue in a number of countries. I believe that deforestation and air pollution are the main culprits of this phenomenon that cause damage to ecology. Consequently, individuals and government can ensure to solve this problem.
The two main factors behind this degradation are contaminated air and clearing forests. According to technology, more and more overpopulation which the reason the earth increases carbon footprint and CO2 in a short time. In addition, the excessive growth of industrial production combined with the substantial increase in transportation leads to the disposal of harmful gases in the environment. These are the key factors destroying the ozone layer which protects our skin away the detrimental effects of ultraviolet rays. As a result, some adverse worth- concerning consequences of service and the frequent occurrence of natural disasters.
Both the authorities and individuals are accountable for the issue of environmental damage. The government needs to enact new international laws and meet to discuss this problem. They can make collaborative effects and certainly criticize compliance with all regulations. In addition, each person I aware of saving ecology and ecology balance. There are actions people can opt for daily to protect the environment, like recycling bottles and cans, saving worldwide animals and use of green fuels and vehicles. For example, provided that individuals are aware of reducing plastic use on a daily basis, the total amount of this substance disposed to the environment would considerably plummet. Human existence is quite impossible without the presence of a healthy environment.
In conclusion, environmental degradation is the disadvantages impact of pollution and deforest. Therefore, private people and the government take responsibility for talking about the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69858156028 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30142605754 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0510506217 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140512041336 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381622135913 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264548951699 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828565786624 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026150822915 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.