Every person has a right to use free health care services which are provided by the government. Taking care of people is one of the most vital responsibilities of management. However, there are both pros and cons to deciding to do this. In this essay, I will discuss some of the reasons why providing free health care is so useful and some of the drawbacks of unpaid medical management.
Let’s begin by looking at the advantages of free health protection. One of the main positives of it is that it gives a chance to poor people to take care of their health. What I mean by this is that medical treatment is quite expensive in private hospitals and there are some people who do not have enough money to pay for it. In this case, they must use their privilege which was given to them by the government.
Secondly, if they get out of proper medical treatment, it can cause huge problems for the whole nation. In other words, epidemics are often spread among the destitute population and then affect the whole country. If those poor citizens do not use their free health care services, it can increase the risk of getting an epidemic among the population.
Turning to the other side of the argument, a lack of equipment and quality are the main problems. Many people who are provided by public health services suffer from unqualified doctors and outdated types of equipment. For example, they have to wait for a long and this is detrimental for patients who need urgent medical attention.
In conclusion, it seems that the benefits of free health care are more significant than the drawbacks. Personally, I believe that if the few negatives are solved by the government, it can be considered a more useful service for people.
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 68
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... do this. In this essay, I will discuss some of the reasons why providing free health care ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...iding free health care is so useful and some of the drawbacks of unpaid medical management....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rawbacks of unpaid medical management. Let's begin by looking at the advan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h was given to them by the government. Secondly, if they get out of proper medi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting an epidemic among the population. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts who need urgent medical attention. In conclusion, it seems that the benefit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i mean, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71617161716 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65809572512 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7960752829 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263539019341 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832887647887 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774352417591 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141171470215 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517268983506 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.