Each year, there is an alarming disappearance of considerable languages. I am totally in favour of life being fairly convenient with a significant decline of numerous languages. This essay will first discuss on how people may benefit speaking a single major language as opposed to different dialects and secondly, the major drawback of the extinctions of diverse languages with relevant examples.
On the one hand, generally speaking, communication becomes remarkably effective provided that there exist fewer languages. Since more accents imply supplementary terminologies, complicated vocabulari...
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 90
- The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for 86
- Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture. Do you think it is important for children to be taught art? Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects? 70
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 70
Essay evaluation report
Not only would a language affects cultural integraties
Not only would a language affect cultural integraties
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1846 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.577 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.195 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 105 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.141 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.518 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a language' or 'another language'.
Suggestion: a language; another language
... language that cannot be transferred to an another language. When their values are gradually replac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dialects'' or 'dialect's'?
Suggestion: dialects'; dialect's
... In conclusion, dwindling of numerous dialects comes in handy in the lives of people d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73716012085 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29853475119 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640483383686 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5585581666 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207093776758 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580407325514 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480057938821 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109372402591 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605979547394 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.