Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extend to you agree or disagree?
Many languages are reported to be extinct annually. It is argued that this phenomenon is not crucial and it makes life more convenient. I agree with the statement that people all over the world can live easily with just a few languages. The essay will analyse how accurate conveying information is and how using some main languages can help to improve the nation's economy to support this thesis.
Firstly, a few languages help people in all parts of the world communicate with each other in an easier way. For example, English and Chinese are two main languages that are spoken by almost all member of society in different countries in the world. Focusing on learning and using these languages can help people to express information as well as thoughts and attitudes more accurate and blur the communication barrier when they relocate to other countries. It can be seen that the disappearance of minority languages will force people to concentrate on the majority language and communicate easily and accurately with foreigners. Thus, the dying out of several languages provides a golden opportunity for people in different nations can understand one another effortlessly.
Secondly, this will help to develop the local economy in remote regions, particularly through tourism. For instance, in some undeveloped areas in Vietnam and China, which are famous for their purely natural landscapes, the locals only speak English or Chinese, so it is not difficult for foreign visitors to grasp and immerse in the local culture and have wonderful experiences. This has gradually attracted a spectacular number of tourists that contributes to the local and national economy. It is clear that focusing on the main languages will improve the finance of a country rather than using their native language, which is understood by fewer people. Therefore, if there is a decrease in the number of languages, not only individuals' life but also the nations will be positively affected.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the extinction of languages annually is making the lives of communities in the world become more convenient
- some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
- in a number of countries some people think it is more necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 78
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extend to you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges. The essay will analyse how accurate conveying information is and how using s...
^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... main languages can help to improve the nations economy to support this thesis. Fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations economy to support this thesis. Firstly, a few languages help people in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 729, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...se in the number of languages, not only individuals life but also the nations will be posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2134502924 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85216645012 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540935672515 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0569773315 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287901763355 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978118001618 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466238278817 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163288901728 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624155347897 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.