Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, extinction of languages has become a global concern. According to some, living with a fewer languages is better. In my opinion, it is not true and the life can get better with different languages.
Languages carries the integral part of a culture’s identity in every country. Each language indicates a complex system of grammar, vocabulary, and linguistic structures. Hence, preventing the loss of the language is very important because not only do the next generation forget and unable to be familiar with their ancestors but also, its diapering may completely affect the national history. The nations should teach their own languages to new generation and expand them to their neighbors which can tackle dying out their mother tongue language.
Changing mother tongue takes time. Although it is easy for the young people to learn new language, this takes time for older people. A person who know more than one language has this opportunities to employ in job markets and international trades. This promotes cross-cultural understanding. The education system should notice teach different international languages to their students. With this students can be familiar with different cultures and traditional, which the most point is prevent from dying languages.
In conclusion, it is not true that with fewer languages people can live easier. All nations and countries should try to save their native language because with this they have saved their culture. This is obvious that I disagree with this belief.
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...son who know more than one language has this opportunities to employ in job markets ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ional languages to their students. With this students can be familiar with different...
^^^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevented'.
Suggestion: prevented
...nd traditional, which the most point is prevent from dying languages. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40416666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8099494608 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4937753297 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349347456553 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115433789829 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06459774677 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216801100265 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490031964688 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...son who know more than one language has this opportunities to employ in job markets ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ional languages to their students. With this students can be familiar with different...
^^^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevented'.
Suggestion: prevented
...nd traditional, which the most point is prevent from dying languages. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40416666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8099494608 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4937753297 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349347456553 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115433789829 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06459774677 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216801100265 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490031964688 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.