Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or a negative development?
There is a clear trend indicating a decline in the popularity of handwriting over the past few decades. This shift can be attributed to the emergence of faster and more convenient writing methods. Despite thepractical advantages of these modern approaches, I hold the view that this shift has negative implications, notably affecting writers' skills and physical well-being.
To commence, modern individuals show areluctance towards employing pens orbrushes for writing because of two factors. Foremost among these is the efficiency of typing, which surpasses traditional writing in speed. Typists benefit from the use of both hands and multiple fingers, facilitating an accelerated work flow and affording additional time for diverse pursuits. Secondly, the act of typing often incorporates supporting features. Notably, online platforms such as Google Docs offer autocorrection, and more recently, Al-generated content suggestions. These technological advancements not only streamline the writing process but also contribute to an effortless writing experience.
Nonetheless, the abandonment of traditional writing tools like pens, pencils, and paper should be regarded as a disadvantageous trend. Chief among the concerns is its impact on physical health. Typing often involves the use of modern technological devices such as computers and smartphones, which have been scientifically proven to contribute to health issues such as poor vision. Another notable consequence is the potential detriment to an individual's writing skills. Many, particularly younger generations, report an overreliance on technological tools for document preparation. For instance, numerous university students now employ ChatGPT to generate written content, gradually losing the ability to choose properwords or grammatical structures to create their own writing.
In conclusion, the declining preference for handwriting, driven by the speed and convenience of typing, is not only understandable but also warrants concern due to its adverse effects on both health and writing proficiency. That is why governments should discourage excessive typing, and educational institutions should prioritize accepting only handwritten essays and reports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 73
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The picture below shows the process of producing ceramic pots Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main features 80
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13418530351 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32359903834 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664536741214 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9314741606 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.941176471 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.043794638798 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0124372312554 0.084324248473 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0205638043789 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0269918369685 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223158809664 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.