As housing a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who can not afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been an argument that people with low economic status ought to be given a complimentary house by their government due to a house being a fundamental dwellers’ demand. In this essays, while I acknowledge the reason of this idea, I would argue that this argument could be misguided
The foremost rationale for this idea could be that there are strong correlation between the low economic status and the social sustainability. It is evident that people who have low income tend to commit crimes, compared to the counterpart with high income due to lack of basic needs including housing. This could lead to the increasing the level of unsustainability and impeding the nations’ path to thriving. Therefore, if the government put more resources into providing no charge housings, several problems associating with people living below the poverty line could be addressed.
However, I believed that this idea could have some implicit drawbacks. Firstly, providing free housing can instill into the poor the sense of dependence. It means that they could be likely to consider the supports of the governments as an apparent duty and have no motivation to look for a job. This not only cannot tackle the problem thoroughly, but also lead to the increase in the rate of unemployment. In addition, if the governments provide poor dwellers with complementary accommodation, other perspectives such as healthcare or education might be allocated less national budget. This, as a result, could take a toll on the general growth of a country.
In conclusion, free housing could give rise to several problems to the thrive of a country. And the government should have substitutable remedies which could be more practical in supporting people living with low economic conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-29 | nguyenkhangtriem | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the percentages ofthe population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011
- Some people think that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the world s environmental problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- As housing a basic need for people the government should provide free housing for everyone who can not afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eing a fundamental dwellers’ demand. In this essays, while I acknowledge the reason ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'correlations'?
Suggestion: correlations
...his idea could be that there are strong correlation between the low economic status and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if the governments provide poor dwellers with complementary accommodation, other ...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... could give rise to several problems to the thrive of a country. And the government should...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22996515679 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01638337024 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1234311131 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172574003103 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645719716074 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574623292501 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114425150278 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132554431805 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.