Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
One school of thought holds that adding more public sports infrastructures is the most effective way to improve public health. While the benefits of this are irrefutable, I would contend that it might be impractical in certain circumstances if carried alone, and thus should be executed in parallel with other measures.
It is understandable why some people acknowledge that increasing sports facilities is the foremost method of improving public health. One rationale for this belief probably is that there is a strong correlation between physical exercise and human wellbeing. The availability of more sports facilities could provide the residents an incentive to exercise regularly, thereby possibly helping them to improve their health. Despite the aforementioned benefits, increasing the number of sports facilities is not feasible for all. This can be seen in the case of occupied individuals, whose hectic schedules often leave them insufficient time to rest, let alone exercising.
Given the aforementioned limitations, I would argue that other measures should also be adopted to better increase public health. Regarding the government’s responsibilities, it is imperative that they should mount more campaigns to raise public awareness about the serious health consequences of a sedentary lifestyle. This can be key to enhancing health and longevity because when they realize these dire repercussions, they will try their best to manage their packed schedules and spend more time doing exercises. Furthermore, poor dietary habits also have a strong impact on public health, with excessive consumption of fast food contributing to an increase in obesity rates. Therefore, in order to improve public health, there is a need to promote healthier eating habits.
In conclusion, although adding sports infrastructures is indeed of necessity to improve public health, it is not feasible for those with busy schedules. For these cases, mounting more campaigns and promoting healthy eating habits are the optimal methods to aid individuals in enhancing their overall well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-07 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | panizzf | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | panizzf | 73 | view |
| 2014-12-04 | ireneashish | 70 | view |
- As housing a basic need for people the government should provide free housing for everyone who can not afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- The graph shows the number of oversea visitors to three different areas in an European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The picture below shows the process of producing ceramic pots Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main features 80
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework from their teachers whereas others believe that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic health. One rationale for this belief probably is that there is a strong corre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66560509554 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12983448917 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2671776156 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381905551264 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134015228617 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971932534057 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217626987436 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699011868879 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic health. One rationale for this belief probably is that there is a strong corre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66560509554 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12983448917 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2671776156 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381905551264 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134015228617 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971932534057 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217626987436 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699011868879 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.