Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports. Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In present day, public health has been increasingly concerned worldwide. While some people contends that their is necessary to install more sport infrastructures as the most effective way to advance community's health, I am firmly of the opinion that this renewed action might not achieve entire potential unless working in combination with other measures.
It might be a good idea to build more sport facilities because of an obvious correlation between physical exercises and human wellbeing. People tends to believe that public desire of engaging in physical are likely to be stimulated by sport facilities, and community health, as a result, could be improved. However, it is the fact that hectic schedules might impede citizens carving out time for participating in physical activities. This means that putting more resources into sport facilities is likely not to enhance entirely the societies’ health.
However, I presume that better measures could be implemented in parallel with former one. The first one is to intensify more campaigns in order that the public could have more insightful knowledge about the severe impacts of sedentary lifestyles. Therefore, people might be more active in spending time doing exercises, inspite of their busy schedules. Moreover, the prevalence of fast food and processed products could be a contributing factor to social health deterioration. If this issue could be addressed by instructing people to make healthier food choices such as home cooking, the general health of societies could be advanced by reaping the benefits of these measure.
To conclude, I strongly believe that it is need to combine installing more sport infrastructure with other measures relating to raise people awareness of benefits of taking part in outdoor activities and choosing more balanced diets to empower social health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 11
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources on young people Do you agree and disagree 84
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ldwide. While some people contends that their is necessary to install more sport infr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47386759582 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90045357928 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9688541841 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.916666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207463445424 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790839835645 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595345122075 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142776231595 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673696808235 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.