As housing is a basis need, some people believe that the government should provide the free housing for people who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that residents having low income should be given complimentary accommodation, which is considered as a fundamental demand of residents. by the government. In this essay, I would argue that this idea could give rise to several issues which may impact the general growth of the countries.
There are many reasons leading to this idea. Firstly, providing the poor with free housing can allow to create a stable home environment. This is because that if residence could be fulfilled the basic needs including housing, a noticeable decrease in the crime rate would be occurred and the public health would be also empowered. As a result, the burden on public services such as accommodation or healthcare, might be no longer put on the authorities. Secondly, the proponents of this idea could also argue that because the governments derive the authority and national budget from the public, the honors is on the governments to supply no charge accommodation for dwellers. Finland could be a good example for this case. Particularly the government of this nation has introduced several ethical housing policies, which could be an attributing factor to a decrease in the rate of homelessness.
However, funding such projects could take a toll on the countries in many aspects. If the authorities put more resources into housing policies, the diversion of resources from other critical sectors and a significant increase in taxes are necessary. Thus, this could hamper the economic growth and place more financial burden on working residents. In addition, providing complementary housing, could be a culprit behind the decline in the proportions of unemployment. There is the fact that residence living under the property line could be disincentivized for work because they would be always received a free net regardless their economic status. Therefore, an economic stagnation of a country could be on a horizon.
To conclude, the idea of supplying the vulnerable residents with free housing is still questionable at best due to aforementioned rationales.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-29 | nguyenkhangtriem | 67 | view |
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The picture below shows the process of producing ceramic pots Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources on young people Do you agree and disagree 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...d as a fundamental demand of residents. by the government. In this essay, I would ...
^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...ng the poor with free housing can allow to create a stable home environment. This is beca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... living under the property line could be disincentivized for work because they wo...
^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would always be
... disincentivized for work because they would be always received a free net regardless their ec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best due to aforementioned rationales.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32317073171 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07480961914 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.674411882 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.705882353 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11410072145 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037393495678 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406615386382 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734560368243 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179568236627 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.