Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time.
It is true that there are few people who can keep the habit of walking regularly. this problem results from several reasons and they should be tackled by individuals as well as the governments.
The amount of time for daily walking has decreased due to two main reasons. The first reason cause is the development of technology with the appearance of lifts and escalators everywhere, especially in offices or shopping centers. In spite of convenience and time-saving benefits, this also encourages laziness when someone, for example, even uses the lift to move between two floors. The second reason is the overuse of private vehicles such as cars and motorbikes, which has discouraged people in walking, even for a short distance. In fact, parents tend to take their children to school by cars although their houses near the school gates for the fear of busy roads.
Measures must be taken by governments and each individual to solve the this serious problem issue. first, regulations should be imposed to restrict the unnecessary use of lifts in low-rise buildings and encourage the usage of stairs. With the sense of restrictions, apparently, there would be more people who are willing to walk some physical stairs instead of troubling themselves with automatic ones. For instance, at some hospitals in Vietnam, except for patients and medical personnel, users need to pay a certain amount of money to utilise the elevators, and this policy has resulted in an increasing number of people climbing stairs and also saved the facility for emergency purposes. Secondly, cars should be discouraged in short-distance journeys and people should go on foot instead. For instance, parents can walk with their children to go to school every morning.
In conclusion, the issue that only a few people take up walking as a part of their daily life results from several reasons, but if governments and individuals take appropriate steps immediately, this problem may be implemented solved soon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nguyễn Thảo Phương | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Nguyễn Thảo Phương | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-02 | linhoang997 | 73 | view |
- NEW TECHNOLOGY HAVE CHANGED THE WAY CHILDREN SPEND THEIR FREE TIME. DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES? 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- the graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...an keep the habit of walking regularly. this problem results from several reasons an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...overnments and each individual to solve the this serious problem issue. first, regulatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...o solve the this serious problem issue. first, regulations should be imposed to restr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in short, such as, as well as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15479876161 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80964485798 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5681619298 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15648073481 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577944944865 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344509739743 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102194196716 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257871941665 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.