Fewer schools are requiring children to learn and improve their handwriting skills. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend?
As the convenience and being time-saving of typing, handwriting is becoming less popular nowadays. Schoolers aren’t required to be professional in handwriting as they were the past. This development allows children to have more time to explore and learning other necessary skills for their life but has some drawbacks too. Considering both sides, the benefits are outweighed by disadvantages, which affect humans’ innate abilities and normal development.
On the one hand, concentrating less on handwriting offers humans some benefits. Firstly, when replacing handwriting by other kinds of noting information like typing, recording, etc., students have more time to learn other important skills like social, language, communication skills, which are very important and required in a technological society like today. It is very common when students use their phones in classes to record the lessons to review after schools so that they can pay all attention to what the lecturer is saying without having to listening and writing at the same time. Therefore, the quality of lessons is higher and learners can feel more comfortable and less stressed-out.
On the other hand, the aforementioned advantages are at the expense of greater drawbacks. By speding less time for handwriting, children are losing their innate abilities. The brain engages differently when we write something by hand, opposing to typing on keyboard or touching the screen, which, according to scientists, helps humans improve memories. Besides, when working with new ideas through handwriting, students retain knowledge better than typing as well as have a more holistic approach to study thanks to the uniquely physical and multidimensional status of this skills. Because of that, spashing out less time on writing by hand means preventing fully development of children.
In conclusion, while the reduction of demands for handwriting in educational places has some advantages in allowing people to adapt with the successive advancements, those benefits are eclipsed by the drawbacks due to the decline in inborn relationship between humans’ brain and handwriting.
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behaviour What is your opinion 73
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quired to be professional in handwriting as they were the past. This development ...
^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...physical and multidimensional status of this skills. Because of that, spashing out l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06899594243 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3522393687 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185483953333 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590083634302 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423427567236 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107823657002 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051945408894 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quired to be professional in handwriting as they were the past. This development ...
^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...physical and multidimensional status of this skills. Because of that, spashing out l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06899594243 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3522393687 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185483953333 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590083634302 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423427567236 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107823657002 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051945408894 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.