Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative

In recent years, thanks to the development of technology, films can be made by both large corporate or only a small personal device with a small budget. In my opinion, this is more likely to have positive consequences.

Firstly, with the advancement of electric devices such as smartphones, computers or cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people throughout the world. Therefore, making films could become closer to daily-life behavior of people. As an example, there are many programs, apps on the computers and smartphones allowed people to edit and make a film then upload it on a social media which connected with millions of others. Secondly, these devices only cost a small amount of money and a little more money to create a successful film. It results in there are a number creative film ideas have a chance to become reality.

Additionally, digital technology also has an important role in searching talented people. In the past, there were a lot of talented people from areas with the difficult conditions such as poor countries or conflict areas could not be connected to the knowledge about how to make a film. In about ten years ago, thanks to the large platform which could connect to billions of people throughout the world such as You Tube or Facebook, people now could easily share experiences about films for others. For instance, in Viet Nam, there are a number of amateur making-film teams become very popular after just one or two films posted on a social platform. Although these films are low-budget but its directors, actors or cameraman could be very successful in the future of film industry. Because of these potentials, generous investors also could donate or invest money to raise a fund to them to improve their talent continuously.

In conclusion, I believe that the film industry is benefited significantly because of the digital technology which enables anyone to produce films

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy which enables anyone to produce films
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05607476636 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76154474974 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554517133956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5780672712 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268886758987 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944173545916 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494433265522 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160174667153 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400615771362 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.