Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about what source of energy to consume. Some people state that fossil fuel should be exploited due to its huge production of energy. Others, however, believe that renewable or alternative energy should be used instead because of its long-term using and environmental-friendly impacts. I mainly agree with the latter point of view for the following reasons.
First, there is no doubt that renewable energy is clean and receives long-term potential energy for the future. Renewable energy such as tidal power, solar energy, hydropower, biomass, wind power and so on enables to be exploited naturally and contributes effectively to the local communites the energy needed for production and agriculture. Solar energy, for instance, is absorbed from the sun, stored in solar panels and could be used whenever needed. More specificially, its mechanism based on the conversion from solar energy to electricity, which does not discharge any harmful pollutants to the ecosystem. Therefore, it is necessary to make use most of the renewable energy.
Furthermore, this type of energy is completely handy to use and the cost is far cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This is because energy could be gained from where people living and does not cost any extra of buying equipments. For example, in Vietnam, some families start using solar batteries placing on top of the roof to absorb as much sunlight as possible and use it whenever being cut off electricity. A further point to note is that these batteries or panels cost approximately four million VND each. On the contrary, exploiting fossil fuel requires costly heavy machines and unhabituated areas to be deployed. Because of its sophisticated systems, its price is extremely extortionate that hardly anyone could afford to buy.
That is not to say that fossil fuel should be abandoned or got rid of energy production. There are, indeed, some people still make use of its capacity to fulfill their demanding purposes. For future prospects, of course, it is still in consideration as a harmfull energy source and carbondioxide-releasing source which results in greenhouse effects and onzone layer depletion. In that case, industries and companies have a tendency of utilizing alternative energy rather than fossil fuel.
In conclusion, this exchangement to alternative could bring profits to industries and a clean environment to citizens. Meanwhile, it is reasonable not to ignore the contribution of fossil fuel to the society. By doing so, we can ensure that the biodiversity is gurranteed as less polluted than before.
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 92
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports Why is it a negative or positive development 84
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 81, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...letely handy to use and the cost is far more cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This is becau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31894484412 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10537762533 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537170263789 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9550758424 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.818181818 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25433197506 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744359772168 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453322179322 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149760627856 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632196619734 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.