It is widely argued that museums or historical exhibitions are ideal attraction destinations to the tourism industry rather than regional resident communities. This essay will first give some plausible explanations and then discuss about how to greatly improve this issue.
First of all, there is no room for doubt that museums and historical sites offer tourists great opportunities to experience a completely new culture, and therefore, provide them with a sufficient amount of knowledge about the sentimental value of a culture. On the other hand, local residents being highly exposed to their contents through history lessons at schools or universities are virtually accustomed to these sites, and thus it seems to be an unnecessary activity for local citizens to pay a visit to these locations. It was recorded from the Vietnamese government that roughly 85% of foreigners visit the Central National Museum compared to only 20% of local students in 2018.
This problem has posed a serious threat to the cultural expansion in many regions worldwide and they need to come up with some ideas to handle this situation. It is crucially important for these sites to make a huge improvement by taking advantage of advanced technological devices which can be applied wisely to attract many local residents. For instance, the Kyoto authority in Japan creates moving artificial dinosaur models which are placed in many museums to provide regional students a brand-new insight of the upbringing of an animal, helping them to gain in-depth knowledge while observing the object.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that museums or historical sites mainly draw huge attention from foreign visitors as opposed to regional people. However, thanks to the application of state-of-the-art technology, local communities have a positive attitude towards these locations and tend to visit frequently.
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 53
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 61
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 79
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45733788396 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96213489697 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645051194539 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9297647832 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.9 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312385901863 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105655390521 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490144539897 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166298392942 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490222783105 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.