Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.
To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
Today’s world most countries dominated to generate power from thermal stations; Whereas, other countries changing their method of producing electricity to renewable resources namely, solar energy, wind, and hydro power. As per my perception, I believe that it a positive step towards green energy and also it can be beneficial for economy. My justification will discussed further.
To begin with, the fossil fuel has very limited resource on the earth and it has many environmental drawbacks too. For an example, using non-renewable resources generate pollution in air, water and soil which affect negatively on living habitats. To taken over this problem some countries promoting renewable energy such as, wind power, solar energy, hydro power, and so on. which is cost effective and zero emission of harmful gases. The renewable energy has infinite sources for utilisation.
Furthermore, there are some nation which is encouraging people to use sustainable energy, for instance, India declare in the state of Gujarat 200,000 home would be solarised by march 2020 and total amount of power allocated in the scheme is 600MW. It means the consumption of coal and fossil fuel reduce by 25%. It will effect environment and economy. To explain this, electricity generated by solar so the air pollution has been decrease and through this scheme many solar industries get approach in their field.
In conclusion, non-renewable sources has very limited and it is also very costlier these days. To come over this situation there are some countries announce subsidy to promote renewable power. Which is beneficial for environment and generate new opportunity for businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Dhairya patel | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | asdfgzxcvb | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | mohamadi654094 | 84 | view |
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 78
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather then understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...cial for economy. My justification will discussed further. To begin with, the fossil f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
... solar energy, hydro power, and so on. which is cost effective and zero emission of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'nations'?
Suggestion: nations
...sation. Furthermore, there are some nation which is encouraging people to use sust...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (India) must be used with a third-person verb: 'declares'.
Suggestion: declares
...sustainable energy, for instance, India declare in the state of Gujarat 200,000 home wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... and fossil fuel reduce by 25%. It will effect environment and economy. To explain thi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...industries get approach in their field. In conclusion, non-renewable sources has...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85011119702 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9846647069 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21556562832 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680608255858 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529232051454 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12893959844 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362797792362 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.