Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.
What are the causes of the shortage of water what measure could governments and individuals take to respond to this problem?
Uploaded by Quang Truong
Since the dawn of time, freshwater has always been an essential but scarce natural resource. However, currently, due to various reasons, the shortage of drinkable water has become a global issue. This essay will analyze the causes and provide some possible solutions that government and individuals should do to tackle this problem.
The two main reasons for the lack of water are the population explosion and pollution. First, the current world population is 7.8 billion, which is increasing dramatically. Meanwhile, the amount of water is diminishing, which is inadequate for people's demands. As a result, the shortage of water occurred. Moreover, when domestic and industrial wastes are discharged straight to the water areas, the freshwater resource becomes polluted. For example, To Lich river has been polluted for many years. Therefore, citizen here does not have adequate drinkable water to use.
Some possible measures could be release to resolve this problem. First, national authorities should raise people's awareness about controlling water usage. They also strict laws for conserving water supplies and preventing people from contaminating it. Moreover, the government should focus on researching the ways of transferring seawater into drinkable water. Similarly, individuals have a tremendous impact on water conservation. They should limit daily water usage, and they also can reuse the water if possible. Moreover, they should refrain from throwing rubbish inappropriate, which leads to water pollution.
In conclusion, the shortage of water is a critical problem which caused by various reasons. There are some methods that both government and individuals can perform to prevent this problem from worsening.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-06 | huyphamdz1902 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | octjulia | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamtrucmaiphuong | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | npanh2007 | 56 | view |
- QUang Truong Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What can be done do to reduce solve them 78
- lol 56
- Version 2 Quang Truong People in many countries are spending less time with their family causes and solutions 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain difficulties of living in a city How governments make urban life better for everyone 2018607180 67
- Quang Truong People in many countries are spending less time with their family Causes and solutions 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67181467181 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85629226617 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2431787919 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3157894737 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6315789474 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305300286871 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960137804447 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499177553017 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197938983036 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338229999355 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67181467181 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85629226617 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2431787919 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3157894737 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6315789474 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305300286871 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960137804447 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499177553017 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197938983036 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338229999355 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.