in the future all cars. buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vihecles outweigh the disadvantages?
Due to the upcoming AI controlled automobile, transportation will seem to be driven without human management, offering human labor more opportunities to handle other tasks during their journey. While some individuals positively approve this potential advantage of technological driving vehicles, I firmly believe that several possible drawbacks should be taken more consideration before its function totally accomplished in the future.
Coupled with the strong supportable imagination, the future of hand-free vehicles is undeniably beneficial upon our dreamed world. Initially, the human laborers, who are working directly with the transportation, such as drivers, will be used to invest in other fields of the job market. To clarify, there are more potential human resources to develop other careers. Furthermore, Some departments related to drivers, such as driving insurance, monthly salary, will be also released from those current pressures by cutting down on the number of drivers.
On the other hand, before the widespread popularity of driverless cars, buses or trucks actually becomes a reality, it necessitates substantial investments in terms of congesting traffic circumstances and human belief in AI technology, particularly, what strongly connects to their survival as daily traveling. While it is undoubted that modern digital landscape has recently given a hand in several industries where people are not compulsorily required, traffic attendance doesn’t seem to align with that, given the fact that traveling highly requires an awareness as well as an intense critical analysis ability of a driver in the immediate occasion. Furthermore, AI technology has not been familiar to human belief, specifically, where they have to put their life in potential danger as they are not able to control the situation driven by an unconscious machine.
In conclusion, as long as the current circumstances, such as traffic problems and human trust, will be completely addressed, driverless transportation would give our future life a better, more convenient life as well as cut down several pressures in our society and our world in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-18 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | mahsamoazzzzzzzzez | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Angina | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | khanh046852 | 56 | view |
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- Many people like to eat unhealthy food even though they know it s bad for them Why is this What is an effective way to improve people s healthy eating habits 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rity of driverless cars, buses or trucks actually becomes a reality, it necessita...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65944272446 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.152639347 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616099071207 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.0078477115 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.8 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156280244034 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057111138709 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361375104087 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937592093502 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238957273173 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.