In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's modern world, incredible inventions are being created every day. Therefore, it has been predicted that all auto mobiles, buses and lorries will be driverless in the future, and only passengers will travel by these transportations. As far as my opinion is concerned, I believe that the demerits of this tendency is more significant than its merits, and this essay will present my reasons.
To commence with, it is true that driverless vehicles might have some benefits. They can be time-saving, as well as their convenience might be beneficial to the community. This is because instead of spending their time driving, citizens could use that time for more vital activities, such as having an online meeting or reading documents. Additionally, since these transportations are automatic, dwellers could pick the nearest car, which would automatically drive to their position without having to wait for a considerable amount of time. Thus, the number of private cars would decrease significantly, which means the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere would decline, therefore, the public health might be improved.
Nevertheless, this tendency could also has significant drawbacks. Driverless cars could be dangerous to the passengers in bad weather conditions, as well as unexpected situations, and they might result in a reduction of employment rate. Because they are operated to deal with certain common situations, in some cases, their inability to solve the problems could lead to death. Rainy days, for example, could make the roads wet and slippy, if a car is operated to run fast on the main road during this condition, it might put passengers in jeopardy of having accidents. Furthermore, jobs such as taxi drivers or delivering drivers would disappear since they have become redundant to the society. As a result, the crime rate would rise because of an increase in the rate of unemployment.
To sum up, although this tendency could be conducive to society, I contend that its detrimental effects is far greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... Nevertheless, this tendency could also has significant drawbacks. Driverless cars ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in some cases, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27743902439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96831466563 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7979135866 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208274618899 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718982361811 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959785539079 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127110925541 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862303366298 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.