In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays, it is anticipated that future means of transportation like cars, buses, and trucks will no longer require drivers, leaving only passengers traveling inside these types of vehicles. This development both brings out some pros and cons regarding the safety and the convenience it offers. However, from my perspective, I do not believe in the possibility of the advantages outweighing the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that transportation becoming driverless will benefit many people for some explicable reasons. First and foremost, chauffeurs are no longer necessary since vehicles can be automatically manipulated by advanced technologies. This offers more space within cars and puts passengers at ease when traveling thanks to some privacy factors. For example, travelers can feel free to have phone calls on sensitive topics without the fear of being listened to by the drivers. Moreover, eliminating the driving seats may result in fewer cases of accidents due to alcoholic overuse, which offers people a sense of safety.
However, on the other hand, driverless transportation can produce some malicious drawbacks which are threatening to society. First, automated vehicles can cause confusion when problems occur. It is extremely uncomfortable to see the high-tech systems breaking down in the middle of the streets, leaving the passengers inside with no basic knowledge to solve the issues immediately. In addition, GPS false navigation is another major drawback for driverless vehicles, which unexpectedly wastes people’s time. Simultaneously, malfunctions in the system operation may result in tragic accidents on the streets, costing the lives of many innocent people and leaving painful trauma for individuals.
In conclusion, although there are some compelling merits for the development of driverless transportation, I believe the downside effects of this situation still outweigh the advantages for some aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugars which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78424657534 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21476489978 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9009615761 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.642857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2332837883 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681601295299 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510978957564 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128854070449 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599135862404 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.