In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
With the development of technology, it is predicted to have more driverless vehicles in roads in the future. Although this development might sound beneficial in many aspects, it still has a number of significant drawbacks that need to be considered. Through this essay, I will list some common merits and demerits brought up by this trend.
To begin with, auto-pilot transport would be very advantageous as it facilitates people’s life. One benefit is that it would be more relaxing and calming for drivers who might be driving to work, school or anywhere else. For example, if someone was nervous or concerned about something, they would not focus while driving and this would rise the probability of having an accident. Through driverless cars, passengers would be less worried about driving while anxious. Moreover, busy individuals benefit from this trend as they can multitask while on their way to work. For example, if an employee had an unfinished assignment, they can simply achieve it while the car is driving on its own.
However, we must not be deceived by this modern trend neglecting its negative aspects. Firstly, while auto-pilot vehicles can decrease the likelihood of accidents, that does not completely mean that they are safe to wander around in roads since they lack the ability of analyzing road signs and not identifying dangerous roads. Therefore, more and more car accidents might occur due to driverless cars and trucks. Another drawback is that individuals and communities will become dependent on those vehicles as slackness would increase broad resulting in useless societies.
To sum up, it is evident that having such advanced technology installed in many societies has many profits as it adds more convenience to people’s life, but we must not turn a blind eye on the disadvantages that come out of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 78
- Some people say that adertising is extremely successful at pursuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss bothe these views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others believe that other measures would be effective in improving road safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ye on the disadvantages that come out of this trend.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14617940199 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80080829447 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4609871533 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17662289866 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650087782602 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453301202357 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101657844874 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417434065125 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.