In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Enthusiasm for using online resources in later life has been at an all-high time in many parts of the world, not least in reading news and books online without paying. While it is argued that decreased buying printed books or newspapers would come about through the developed online resources, I advocate that printed books and newspapers would be still indispensable.
The first reason for this move away from printed books and newspapers is that being well-informed by using online resources is to avoid being time-consuming and labored-consuming. Indeed, online-based information renders geographical location irrelevant, and people can access information without extra charge, apart from the monthly wifi charge. In addition, readers can update themselves by certain hot news online every free time without waiting until books or newspapers are published at the weekend. For example, newspapers on the Internet are updated continually almost 24 hours a day, and readers just need the wireless network for downloading this news.
On the other hand, printed books and newspapers are offered for the elderly because their eyes are degraded; as a result, gluing to e-books screens for a long time is harmful to their eyes. This can make the effectiveness of online news lag behind the efficacy of online information in terms of the old people. Moreover, the idea that Internet-based information is not the optimal choice for the elderly can be attributed to technical barriers. For instance, old people can not keep themselves abreast of all the latest developments in contemporary society; therefore, they do not know how to tap keywords on the engine and choose the true news, which is mixed with the fake ones.
In conclusion, while the online-based information can be time-saving and labored-saving, printed books and newspapers make perfect sense for the aforementioned reasons. I suggest that governments should find the right balance between the two.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 87
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36688311688 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03220159294 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2161920923 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208827317874 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805420033553 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048974537667 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137200443484 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360537672637 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.