In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the last decades, we have witnessed a great breakthrough in technology. Typically, all kinds of traditional forms of reading such as books or printed newspapers have gradually been replaced by using the internet. And it is predicted that people will totally read everything they want online instead of purchasing printed newspapers or books. I partly agree with that prediction, in some cases, people remain opting for the traditional one.
There is an indispensable fact that electronic newspapers, as well as books, bring a wide range of benefits for users. First of all, thanks to this modern way, we can effortlessly read everything we want whenever we own a private computer or mobile phone. Secondly, electronic newspapers and books store a vast amount of information and stories, those ones will be opened quickly via a click of a button, thus we freely select what we want to read or our favorite stories as well as the data we need for our researching. Additionally, electronic books and newspapers provide us with a plethora of reliable information without worrying to lose them. Finally, the most predominant advantage is that the online one hardly costs a fee to access, just by enrolling the e-newspapers or books app in the mobile phone as well as computer, we can conveniently read them without charging.
However, a minority of people still buy printed newspapers or books to meet the demand for their reading. Since they believe actual newspapers or books are the precious values of human beings which have been created by our ancestors in retrospect, overexploiting the internet to read will gradually erode traditional values. Furthermore, a bad connection to the internet or the depletion of battery in your mobile phone will have an adverse effect on their reading process, which probably results in feeling a bit sense of anger.
By way of conclusion, we should give priority to utilize online newspapers and books, but at the same time, we shouldn't entirely eliminate the traditional forms of reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...vast amount of information and stories, those ones will be opened quickly via a click of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ers and books, but at the same time, we shouldnt entirely eliminate the traditional form...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93411681327 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4064059698 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.076923077 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264242900046 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962086510703 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790167781336 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153481097348 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705345153623 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...vast amount of information and stories, those ones will be opened quickly via a click of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ers and books, but at the same time, we shouldnt entirely eliminate the traditional form...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93411681327 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4064059698 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.076923077 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264242900046 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962086510703 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790167781336 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153481097348 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705345153623 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.