The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider; the rich is becoming richer, and the poor are getting even poorer. What problems can the situation cause? What can be done to reduce this gap?
The space between the people who are wealth and poor are wider. It seems to be some reasons why it is happened and what kind of actions can be taken to tackle this problem.
To begin with, some clarifications appear to explain what is the cause among the rich and poor people. First, the power which become their strength to do anything and dominates their willing to get what they want. Almost the wealthy people are clever, they could arrange some strategies for expand their fortune. For instance, rich people would show their power by owning some sumptuous properties, these are kind of investment and showing their existence. In contrary, the poor people would restricted to actualize their dreams because lack of money and willing to pursue it. They also confine their actions which could expand their wealth since everyone could not recognize them well. For example, the poor people restricted to enlarge their business because of lack of people who could affect others. Some valuable restrictions complicate their problems.
Furthermore, to solve the wide gap between people who wealth and miserable, the government needs to regulate these people to collaborate and become needed each other. The awareness between the rich and poor people could minimize the space. For example, the government arranges the policy which makes the wealthy people to pay social funding to increase the poor people abilities to work. The useful skills could help for their sustainability of life and it will expand their confidence to earn much more money.
In conclusion, the economic disparity is created by power and chance which things that the poor people do not have. It will be decreased if the third side exist to help to regulate the rich and poor people.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your 61
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your 56
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider; the rich is becoming richer, and the poor are getting even poorer. What problems can the situation cause? What can be done to reduce this gap? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
The space between the people who are wealth and poor are wider. It seems to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'restrict'
Suggestion: restrict
...nce. In contrary, the poor people would restricted to actualize their dreams because lack ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03780068729 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41485172196 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498281786942 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8849414704 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205184886281 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807008139239 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709408349352 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154953675813 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635655753006 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.