Gay marriage law becomes an uncontrolled controversial issues in our
socitey.Many people encourage for government to accept this law while
people think that it will dirty the natural human rules between the man
and woman.
Can you explain your idea about this problem ? Discuss both views.Write
an essay at least 360 words
Gay marriage law has become an argument in our community.Many
people think that this marriage law should be approved by government
but others believe that it has changed the marriage definition between a
man and a woman. I totally agree with the statement that this marriage
law should be approved by government.
On the one hand, a group of people presume that it will be perfect if
authority approve this law. This point can be attributed to a host of
factor. Firstly, due to modern life, human has become changed both
body and mind, they have many different thoughts and currently, there
are more and more people who are gay often appear in the daily life. A
large number of people believed that it is an unimportant issues and
regard it as a normal thing. For example, today if we see them, we will
not pay attention or even admire them as a celebrity. Secondly, in all
countries’ law, every citizens, townspeople, human are completely good
treated by happiness rights, protection rights, and the rights about being
cared. Notwithstanding a part of people discriminate them, they
invariably fight for the rights. Thirdly, there is a crowd of people
advocate for LGBT community. This is because some people disagree
with this law are doing like being falsify for the human rights or today
we have the evidence to prove for their right interest. It is undoubted
truth that a range of distinguished people are gay but it does not impact
on their career or their life.
One the other hand, it is widely believed that this law are transforming
the natural human concept between woman and man. In fact, an array of
people who was born in 1990s or lower do not agree as it is effortless to
perceive the cause that they have not seen any this kind of love before. It
is apparent for them to regard this love as a different thing, eccentric and
someone points out that it contrast natural rules. Apart from that, a lot of
gay people partly critic a normal person that they are old-fashioned and
it leads to an inferior LGBT community reputation. Especially, even
some scientists find out that these people is having a considerable
disease although it is not absolutely accurate information and it affects to
the people who read tabloid.
In conclusion, two points above have each advantages and drawbacks.
Some people consider that this law should be accepted while others
concern this as an unacceptable law. I contend that it would be better for
government to approve this law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | vudinhthuyrgrhrhhornot232feffe | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | vudinhthuyrgrhrhhornot232feffe | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | thuycute661@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | vudinhthuyornot36464 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | vudinhthuyornot36464 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Many
...has become an argument in our community.Many people think that this marriage law sh...
^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... changed both body and mind, they have many different thoughts and currently, there are more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 70, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...are gay often appear in the daily life. A large number of people believed that it is an unimporta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 21, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
... fact, an array of people who was born in 1990s or lower do not agree as it is effortle...
^^^^^^^^
Line 31, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rson that they are old-fashioned and it leads to an inferior LGBT community rep...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93255813953 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68775340914 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504651162791 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6892955381 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.05 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 37.0 4.38176352705 844% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374672375781 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117256296895 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862002371628 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089547260962 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775259122488 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.