Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the state-of-art technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion!
Some people think that in this age of globalization, the traditional way of giving lectures in large classrooms has become outdated. I do not agree with this view. Personally, I feel that giving lectures are preferable to the traditional way of teaching, and the reasons of this argument will be explained below.
Firstly, Teaching by using the old-fashioned method in classrooms is more effective. This may impact students to become active in every lecture. That allows students to interact with lecturers when there is clarification required. Moreover, Traditional lectures can navigate students to take the complex connection between students and teachers. The connection will establish information which students need from the teachers particularly. Ultimately, a lecturer can tell at any point of time whether the students understand the lesson by simply looking at their face and body language or not.
However, I do understand some people who think differently, saying that the traditional lectures are ineffective yet, I believe that people have some reasons about why choose the online learning. For the first, people feel comfortable in which it is marked by taking schedule whenever. Because of this flexibility and convenience, online lectures are very popular among many people. For instance, these lectures can be watched during the weekend and they also allow people to pause in the middle of the lecture and watch later.
Taking everything into consideration, I feel traditional lectures are the wiser course, as the reason is online lectures cannot completely replace the classroom lectures because they fail to create an important human connection between lectures and students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-08 | Afi Iskandar | 61 | view |
- Is it good for families if parents need to travel a lot in their job or if they need to move to other cities Is moving to a new location positive for children 76
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the state-of-art technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give 61
- Is it good for families if parents need to travel a lot in their job or if they need to move to other cities? Is moving to a new location positive for children? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51908396947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93907008694 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0012754957 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194364716191 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720164416808 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455943845648 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123525486879 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530964885954 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.