The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
Governmental payment varies between paying its money on arts and public services, so there are two contradictories arguments. Some people accept that government must pay its money in public's services only, while others see that government should invest also in arts. This essay will discuss the different two view points and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods.
First, arts and music can teach people to be quiet, calm and how to acquire values from the artists. Teachers in schools must teach children what is the importance of teaching those. Because kids and adults will know the culture of other countries. In Egypt there are a lot of examples that illustrate how my country is interesting in music as Omar Khairat,s Orchestra that admires millions of people. There are also a lot of tourists that come to watch Om Kalthom,s and Abd Elhalim, s parties. Hamlet is also an example of arts which is a beautiful art and famous around the world. Although there are many advantages of spending a lot of money on arts, there are disadvantages that come when the general funds invest in awful arts that will affect the next generations. To summarize the first point, there are a lot of important things to know when the local government spend on arts such as tasting the beautiful arts and earn knew knowledge about other countries.
Second, local government should invest also in public services as bridges, fix the old roads and discover new roads. Expending on these methods is huge and enormous. The advantage of investing in roads will decrease the accidents in streets; this will lead to pass between cities easily. For example the time spends when we ride trams is shorter than cars in rush hour. Briefly the first and important thing to local government is investing in public services.
In conclusion, expending on arts and general services are important, but the government must increase the weight that expending on the second approach. So I strongly agree that it must invest in two methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...mples that illustrate how my country is interesting in music as Omar Khairat,s Orchestra t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
... is interesting in music as Omar Khairat,s Orchestra that admires millions of peo...
^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s interesting in music as Omar Khairat,s Orchestra that admires millions of peopl...
^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...f tourists that come to watch Om Kalthom,s and Abd Elhalim, s parties. Hamlet is a...
^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the second approach. So I strongly agree that it must invest in two methods.
^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cond approach. So I strongly agree that it must invest in two methods.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95588235294 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60751343191 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532352941176 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6010399429 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6111111111 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34415842724 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968154388204 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982618252099 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212488115348 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498122436952 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.