The government should make laws about people's nutrition and food choice. Others argue that that would be their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Should people make their own food preferences or not has become a topic of public concern. While a number of people convince that the government should draft policies about food choice, others believe that making personal decisions is superior. From my perspective, I lean towards the latter view.
On the one hand, there are sufficient grounds to argue that the authority should create legislation about food preferences. First of all, following food legislation can motivate citizens to adopt healthier eating habits. By having a feasible eating plan and a clear understanding of various kinds of food, individuals can make their own meals with different sources of nutrition and dishes containing enough vitamins, minerals, and fiber. Furthermore, obeying dietary laws can reinforce and improve people’s well-being. It stands for the reason that citizens might curtail the consumption of fast food or junk foods, which means they can reduce the risk of having some serious diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and high blood pressure. Therefore, saving the medical treatment expense and enhancing their physical well-being.
On the other hand, I strongly advocate that people should make personal decisions about dietary needs. The first reason for this is that individuals can combine various kinds of food. Since people sample many different flavors, they can enhance creativity, this allows them to create numerous new dishes, thereby, diversifying the culinary scene. Secondly, citizens can make their eating menu to suit their health conditions and savor. It is clear that not everyone can eat all kinds of food that the government suggest, some individuals might have allergies after eating different kinds of dishes. Take seafood as an example, when eating those foods made from crabs, squids, oysters, or clams, some individuals can break out in a rash and have an itchy feeling, more seriously, they might have difficulties in breathing.
In conclusion, although obeying food legislation can benefit people to some extent, it is my firm belief that making personal decisions about food can diversify the world’s cuisine and avoid some detrimental effects on a part of citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | thanhnga285 | 84 | view |
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 73
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 67
- In their advertising businesses nowadays emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ious kinds of food. Since people sample many different flavors, they can enhance creativity, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68432518962 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0189323438 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21330765088 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837246217387 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638987646701 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155630119891 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660440751881 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.