The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree

In this era, it is undeniable fact that spending of capital income of a nation in to protect the environment could be a beneficial in order to mantain sustainability of environment itself. While, it seem that some dilemmas more urgent to be handled or likely more devastate, i strongly believe both local environmental issues or the other problems are vitally equal in term of how to authority to treat them.
Distributing some money to tackle the worsening of urgent environmental issues should be taken by government with regard to reduce the devastation. For salient example, firstly, creating public infrastructure as an increase of convenient transportation systems could reduce of people for using private vehicles and decrese the air pollution from emission. Secondly, goverment also could held conferences, research and international summits in order to generate joint efforts; for instance ,Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act to againts global scale issues and it becomes worldwide. However, i believe the other local environmental issues also must be taken.
On the other hand, an amounts of money from devise of nation could become beneficial against local enviromental issues. For example, farmer will be helped if government provide chemical subtances to preventing for pest striking, which lead to suffiecient goods and better quality of crops. Then, local authority also could preserve habitant of endangered species with pay more to monitor protected areas from illegal hunting and logging and therefore biodiversity and ecosystem will stable. Futhermore, goverment could contribute to research which focused on the quality of water and soil, and absolutely will be merits to the people’s health and neccesities.
To sum up, eventhough urgent dilemmas look like more imporant to tackle, the low-scale problem in a country also considerable equal.

Votes
Average: 7 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...bility of environment itself. While, it seem that some dilemmas more urgent to be ha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...mission. Secondly, goverment also could held conferences, research and international...
^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to generate joint efforts; for instance ,Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act ...
^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sues and it becomes worldwide. However, i believe the other local environmental i...
^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an amount' or simply 'amounts'?
Suggestion: an amount; amounts
...also must be taken. On the other hand, an amounts of money from devise of nation could be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...provide chemical subtances to preventing for pest striking, which lead to suffiec...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52777777778 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02305154828 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9170033515 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8181818182 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173450432496 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702472939674 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623572830709 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10305893512 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377694299738 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.