The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a few decades, it’s believed that money should be spent to deal with enormous problems such as global warming instead of local environmental problems. In my opinions, I wholly disagree with this statement.
Nowadays, the government need to concert with a plenty of local environmental problems such as discharging toxic chemical waste, natural resources are gradually depleted, deforestation,…Many of them put a long-term strain on the government. They have to find out the way to preserve the local environment, for example, leaders are trying to raise the public awareness, promote public campaigns, and increase the number of public transports to cut down the amount of carbon footprint. This is the reason why leaders have to fund a lot of money to address the local environmental problems.
Futher more, the local environmental problems lead to the urgent and threatening issues such as global warming. Deforestation leads to the global issues. To clear that, plants and trees are cut down and make the amount of carbon dioxide in the air increase. As a result, it activate the climate change. Water pollution changes the marine co-system and the local climate. Polluted air from factories heat the air and lead to the ice melting in the North Pole. All of those local problems lead to enormous global issues. If the government raise money on local problems, they not only alleviate the local evironmental problems, but they also deal with the global warming.
In conclusion, the gorvernment should try their best to solve the local environmental problems so as to tackle the global warming or climate change. Additionally, they should also spent money to directly solve the urgent problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-18 | fmichela | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | haihapham2k | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | PhuongAnh16 | 42 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | oyondev007 | 92 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | katenokk84 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...es are gradually depleted, deforestation,…Many of them put a long-term strain on t...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Many
... are gradually depleted, deforestation,…Many of them put a long-term strain on the g...
^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'activates'?
Suggestion: activates
...de in the air increase. As a result, it activate the climate change. Water pollution cha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... solve the local environmental problems so as to tackle the global warming or climate ch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... change. Additionally, they should also spent money to directly solve the urgent prob...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23636363636 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9661985578 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1415588261 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348334766678 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112762513602 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100216278281 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216206220979 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356425768958 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.