It is often argued that governments should give more budget to railways than to roads. In my opinion, both railways and roads are equally important and governments should spend an equal amount of money on both types of infrastructure.
On one hand, railways provide a greater facility for long distance travel. Also, railways are a lot cheaper to commute than to travel by roads. Furthermore, it costs a lot less to maintain railways and rail infrastructure than roads improvements. Additionally, there is no problem of traffic congestion while travelling by trains. Whereas there are a large number...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: ajmeet
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 69
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for long distance travel. Also, railways are a lot cheaper to commute than to tra...
^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...travelling by trains. Whereas there are a large number of vehicles on roads nowadays and the numb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gestion on roads. Governments can't solve this problem without public suppor...
^^
Line 2, column 586, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ort. When people make a choice of using less cars then the problem of road traffic c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...people make a choice of using less cars then the problem of road traffic congestion ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 655, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... road traffic congestion can be solved. Thus railways are faster ,cheaper and conven...
^^^^
Line 2, column 679, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can be solved. Thus railways are faster ,cheaper and convenient to travel. So inv...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents. Also, railways use coal and diesel as their source of fuel and this adds to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1826625387 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91444919811 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498452012384 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8635789299 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150662394384 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569909387861 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518793450396 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102158254811 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563646349425 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.