Governments should money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
there are two main of land transportation, one-wheels vehicles, and trains. 2-or-4 wheel vehicles need a road to travel by, while trains access its own track, railways. Due to some problems have been brought by the roads, the government should expand the railway construction.
First of all, the road is contained with transportation that can emit a toxic gas. Most of the cars are generated by the petrol engine. When petrol is sublimated, gas release to the air, and can harm pedestrian. The passengers will breathe a toxic gas. Soon or later, they will suffer from the lung-related disease. Second, of it, many accidents occur in the road, cars colliding or even heat-and-run tragedy. Therefore, most of the criminal acts are spread on the road. If the government put their attention on the road, more terrible phenomena will happen.
Compare to the road, the railway is safer. it does not contain gas-released transportation. Most of our trains are built by advanced technology. Trains engineers use magnetic control engine that can push the train runs faster without any emulating gas. In so forth, trains become environmental friendly transportation. Railways also do not have any conjunction, then the commuters will not worry about congestion, so they can arrive at their destination punctually. And most of it, there was less accident on railways because train transports individually on tracks and unlikely collide with another train.
In conclusion, the government should extend the railways in order to impress the environmental problems that occur on the roads. Besides that, railways are less pollution and more convenience.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
2020-01-28 | mynameisduyen | 61 | view |
2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in the three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
- some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there are two main of land transportation, on...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'mains'?
Suggestion: mains
there are two main of land transportation, one-wheels vehi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...pare to the road, the railway is safer. it does not contain gas-released transport...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29118773946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98991027021 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8181764548 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.05 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.05 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109844149249 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327243930092 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516029124334 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840354611266 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049875189628 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.