Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
People have different views about whether or not government should build railways instead of roadways. Personally, I totally agree with the idea that politicians need to spend more money for upgradation and construction train systems.
In my opinion, the modern train lines bring many benefits to individuals. People can travel faster by trains and avoid struggling with traffic congestion in comparision with road users. Train can achieve very high speeds while moving, therefore they help people spend less time commuting. Also, since trains use separate lanes they will prevent issues such as traffic jams or severe accidents. Furthermore, transportation will be more comfortable because passengers do not have to monitor vehicles by themselves and can enjoy the sceneries along the railways, have some drinks or take a nap. People certainly have better transport experience with travelling by train than other roadways’ means.
In addition, investment in train lines’ erection is necessary for society. Firstly, train roads are low-pollution transportation with the amount of exhaust fumes emissions is approximately four time less than trucks or cars. This means train system reduces air pollution and takes part in environment protection. Secondly, in major cities with high travelling demand, investing in trains will help tackle traffic overcrowded problem. Most residents commuting by trains can curb the blooming increase in the number of cars and motorbikes every year. Less self vehicles used will contribute in reducing traffic problems such as traffic jams or car crashes.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that government should allocate more capital to develop railways because of their certain benefits compared to roadways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not government should build railways instea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67415730337 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83027639066 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65543071161 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5099321926 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150815493583 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503159851749 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481299874179 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107511438462 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537143487964 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.