The Government funds and where they should be applied is a topic that has been present through out the years. One of the topics of the moment in our society is concerned whether that investment should be made on railways or on roads. In my point of view, they must be directed to streets and roads pavements if we want to provide alternatives to all citizens and be prepared to the future.
First of all, as a developed society we should have alternatives to all people that belong to it. Having this thought in mind, if roads are in better conditions, we can have public transport travelling on them, as well as private cars, reaching places the train never could. Therefore, public transport can be available to all population, but especially considering the ones with less financial capabilities or older citizens. In the other hand, it can also give travel conditions to alternatives to the ones previously mentioned, as private luxury vehicles for the ones who can afford them. Moreover, roads can go to places the trains tracks cannot, which allow for the travellers to have more destination options. These are the points we can already have an advantage but nevertheless, we should not forget to plan the country future.
'The road that leads to our future' can be our marketing slogan and the governments must be aware of that, because of the new technology that is arriving and also, the money they can gain with tourism as well. Nowadays, the electric car is coming and road improvements should be made to make the buyers more keen in choosing this less polluting vehicle. Next, it is important to consider the financial side and although an initial investment must be made on the roads, later they shall provide an increase in tourists, leading to higher cash receipts.
In conclusion, the roads are the present and the future in one combined, that can be the answer to most of the population needs, as well as, to invest in more environmental friendly solutions and more profitable ones as well. It is possible also to recommend to the governments that this investment should be done as soon as possible, having present all the facts previously mentioned.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 89
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 35
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...pplied is a topic that has been present through out the years. One of the topics of the mom...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...points we can already have an advantage but nevertheless, we should not forget to plan the count...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86141304348 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73077005479 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508152173913 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2160242979 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.785714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0782283181827 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335502343543 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0212112244448 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526694729074 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00493103978014 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.