governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, transportation ways are varied and governments should invest in development for them. The main two means are roads and railways. I believe that railways are much important than roads to spend money for their expansion. In this essay, I will discuss the causes of my opinion.
Trains transport passengers, equipment, and materials all over the world in a cheaper way. This is because of the energy consumption for traveling. A train can carry tones of things 50 times more than trucks with fewer fuels in comparison with that. This will lead to less expensive transportation and makes the rails more economical than roads. Moreover, the novel technological trains reach a speed of 500 kilometers per hour which cannot compare with the cars speed. In no-limit speed, German Autobahns cars move for 200 KMH for average and just for 150 kilometers so the people choose trains to go where ever they want. Therefore, these two are the main reasons for governments to invest in railways and not road.
On the other hand, roads have some benefits such as convenience. For example, a train cannot be stopped by the passengers where they want to enjoy natural scenery while a car can easily be parked. also, trucks can reach impassable regions where there is no way to reach by trains. However, these two reasons are weak to convince decision-makers to invest on roads and highways more that railways.
To summarize this essay, although roads have lots of benefits for passengers and industrial usage, in my opinion, it is not rational to spend most of the money on it and its rival, road, is the winner of this game while plays a more significant role in transportation. The trains not only use less energy but also, are quicker than another mean of transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when needed. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- the bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both id 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
... kilometers so the people choose trains to go where ever they want. Therefore, these ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...enery while a car can easily be parked. also, trucks can reach impassable regions wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92333333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71010249909 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7027844492 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8823529412 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13603905228 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467789022562 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495062654931 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921090341272 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581065768486 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.