Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
Railways for the train and roads for cars both bring convenience to people, but in terms of the cost, the difficulty of construction and the profits, I believe that roads are better.
Admittedly, trains can carry more goods than cars and transport faster. The distance between two places is quite shorter in the railways, compared with roads which are always curved around the mountains. Also, the speed of trains is higher than cars because there is almost no traffic lights in the railways. However, the cost of them is significantly different. The construction of railways usually requires the government to dig tunnels due to mountains the countryside, which is incredibly expensive. On the contrary, roads can be built around the mountain and engineers can design the route without crossing the mountains. Although the total distance is extended, the money for this is negligible in contrast to the cost of the tunnel.
What's more, roads are more convenient than railways in two aspects. Firstly, people can drive private cars on roads rather than railways since railways are only suitable for trains. Whenever one wants to travel, he can drive the car to wherever he wants to go, while he cannot take the train due to the fact that there are usually no trains at night. Secondly, trains can only stop at the train station. Because train stations can only be built in the city or in a small town with a large population. For villagers who live in remote areas without train stations, there is no choice but to get off the train at the nearest station then walk home.
All in all, considering the money spent in construction and the convenience of two kinds of transportation, it is wise for governments to build roads for the sake of the development of the country and the local people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 73
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 72
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years. 78
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... contrast to the cost of the tunnel. Whats more, roads are more convenient than ra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8664495114 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64996476092 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2780965709 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128228665047 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483302820427 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583371070029 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764243419097 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022495688917 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.