Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this agreement?
In these days, transportation is very crucial for day-to-day life. In this regard, people believe that the authority should spend more budgets on railways than roads service. As far as it is concerned to me, I am completely agreed with this statement. This essay highlights the major benefit of railway services while executive spend more money on it.
To begin with, railways are the most efficient and trustable transportation tools among the other's vehicle services. Similarly, train services are the very convenient in terms of the time and safety. Nowadays, people have busier schedule, which need to save more time and energy they preferred to use train services like bullet train. For its instance, one of the researches conducted in Japan shown that most of the people preferred to use the train services to save their valuable time. Hence, in this hectic world people does not have more time it is better to spend more budget on railways service by administration to help their citizen.
Nowadays, railways services are the most eco-friendly and safest transportation in the world. It helps to reduce the pollution and traffic, while using the motor service it creates more pollution and traffic. Train are most safe than the other’s transportation however, people cannot deny the accident because of technical error. To exemplify it, research conducted in Australia in 2012 shown that railways service are safer and environment friendly. Thus, subway services are the more convenient and efficient transportation services in the world.
All in all, railways are most essential services for the citizen to reduce their time consumption, pollution and traffic. It is more trustable in terms of safety. The concern authority should think and make plan to develop the railways services. On the other hand, every developing country cannot afford the subway services in initial phase they need to think about other transportation too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | deepak kadariya | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | deepak kadariya | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | deepak kadariya | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...rustable transportation tools among the others vehicle services. Similarly, train serv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, similarly, thus, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29677419355 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76520674928 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493548387097 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6872587709 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133501298403 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528736796089 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692919991355 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104826833193 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966735968018 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...rustable transportation tools among the others vehicle services. Similarly, train serv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, similarly, thus, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29677419355 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76520674928 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493548387097 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6872587709 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133501298403 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528736796089 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692919991355 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104826833193 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966735968018 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.