Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Transportation, such as train, car, plane and ferry, is improtant for people. Therefore, governments should construct infrastructure for every means of transportation. However, some people claim that governments ought to invest money on railways rather than roads. This essay utterly oppose this view.

To begin with, governments should not only spend money on railways because transportation by train has multiple demerits. Firstly, by train is not an optimal choice, if traveler need to arrive a destination thousand miles away, whchi will take more than one day. In this case, by plane is more comfortable and time-saving than by trian. Secondly, certain terrain is not suitable for laying rails. Thus, trains cannot reach everywhere as people wanted. Lastly, live stocks are not suitable for transporting by train. For example, to transport cows and sheeps will require enormous effort to accomplish the job. Due to these disadvantages of transporting by train, the government must not merely invest on railway, rather they should consider other means of transportation.

By contrast, roads own immense advantages in terms of transportation, therefore, government should also spend money on constructing roads. First, roads cover far more area than trans. Cars can stop at any place on roads; whereas, trains can only stop at stations. Second, everyday life of residents necessitates a comprehensive road network. For instance, roads need to be constructed to link venues like supermarket, hostipal, home and so on. Therefore, government also ought to build roads to provied necessity for daily life.

To recapitulate, this essay rejects the idea that governments should spend money on railways rather than roads, because roads are equally important, so are other means of transportation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Transportation, such as train, car, plan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...This essay utterly oppose this view. To begin with, governments should not on...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...f traveler need to arrive a destination thousand miles away, whchi will take more than o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sider other means of transportation. By contrast, roads own immense advantage...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any place on roads; whereas, trains can only stop at stations. Second, everyday ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to provied necessity for daily life. To recapitulate, this essay rejects the ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55272727273 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07288864557 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9112919685 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3684210526 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4736842105 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222671749756 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703797950774 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620407301819 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159723953472 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388418409496 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.