The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph reveals the emissiom of carbon dioxide in four different countries,including the United Kingdom,Sweden,Italy and Portagul,during a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom and Sweden tended to fall.On the contrary,that in two countries remaining seemed to be growth.
In 1967,the United Kingdom stood at approximately 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions and became the highest one among four countries.Then,it decreased rapidly by 2 metric tonnes for 40 years.Similarly,the emission of carbon dioxide in Sweden reached a peak at over 10 metric tonnes in 1997 before going down over period a 30-year.
By contrast,there was a significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions in Italy and Portugal.The average carbon dioxide emissions in Italy overtook that in Sweden and became the highest metric tonnes with nearly 8 in 2007.In Portugal,the level of carbon dioxide emissions raised considerably from almost 2 metric tonnes to about 5 metric tonnes between 1967 and 2007.Suprisingly,there was an equal numbers of metric tonnes in Sweden and Portugal in 2007.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 w 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , including
...rbon dioxide in four different countries,including the United Kingdom,Sweden,Italy and Por...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Sweden
...t countries,including the United Kingdom,Sweden,Italy and Portagul,during a 40-year per...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , during
...United Kingdom,Sweden,Italy and Portagul,during a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007. It...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...nited Kingdom and Sweden tended to fall.On the contrary,that in two countries rema...
^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
...nd Sweden tended to fall.On the contrary,that in two countries remaining seemed to be...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...me the highest one among four countries.Then,it decreased rapidly by 2 metric tonnes...
^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...he highest one among four countries.Then,it decreased rapidly by 2 metric tonnes fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...rapidly by 2 metric tonnes for 40 years.Similarly,the emission of carbon dioxide in Swede...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...y 2 metric tonnes for 40 years.Similarly,the emission of carbon dioxide in Sweden re...
^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...down over period a 30-year. By contrast,there was a significant increase in carbon di...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...dioxide emissions in Italy and Portugal.The average carbon dioxide emissions in Ita...
^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...est metric tonnes with nearly 8 in 2007.In Portugal,the level of carbon dioxide em...
^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...tonnes with nearly 8 in 2007.In Portugal,the level of carbon dioxide emissions raise...
^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Suprisingly
...t 5 metric tonnes between 1967 and 2007.Suprisingly,there was an equal numbers of metric to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...tonnes between 1967 and 2007.Suprisingly,there was an equal numbers of metric tonnes i...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294117647059 0.247107183377 119% => OK
Verbs: 0.0882352941176 0.155533422707 57% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0882352941176 0.0946595960268 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0294117647059 0.0501214627716 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00980392156863 0.0437548338989 22% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.18137254902 0.122226691241 148% => OK
Participles: 0.0147058823529 0.0403226058552 36% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.63849389147 2.80594681477 130% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0196078431373 0.0326793684256 60% => OK
Particles: 0.00490196078431 0.00163938923432 299% => OK
Determiners: 0.078431372549 0.0861772015684 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.021408717616 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1157.0 1933.35771543 60% => OK
No of words: 178.0 316.048096192 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.5 6.12580529183 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20517956788 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.505617977528 0.374742101984 135% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286516853933 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162921348315 0.203846283523 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123595505618 0.137316102897 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63849389147 2.80594681477 130% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.037074148 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.5945299356 60.7387585426 73% => OK
How many sentences: 4.0 16.0891783567 25% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 44.5 20.7743622355 214% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 117.65707586 49.517814964 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 289.25 127.492653851 227% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.5 20.7743622355 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.814263465372 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 3.99599198397 375% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 73.1516853933 49.1944974215 149% => OK
Elegance: 3.84615384615 1.69124875643 227% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472723896588 0.332605444948 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.321011946769 0.102741220458 312% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0988537517652 0.0668466124924 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 1.0 0.534860350844 187% => Sentence paragraph similarity is high.
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 1.35973995551e-16 0.148594505496 0% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.350207579838 0.134430193775 261% => Sentence topic similarity is too high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597924153489 0.0742795772207 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365647062774 0.324371583561 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0866042365857 0.0638462369009 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350207579838 0.228012699653 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597924153489 0.058150111329 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 5.90881763527 17% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 1.0 10.4468937876 10% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.