The graph illustrates the ratio of the population aged 65 and over from 1940 to 2040 in three 3 different nations namely Japan, Sweden and the USA. It is measured in percentage.
Overall, the all nations saw fluctuations all over the period and they assumed to increase by 2040.Moreover, it assumed Japan and the USA swap their positon but Sweden retain it’s spot.
A more detail look at the chart reveals, in 1940 the ratio of the population in Japan was 5 percent and after that it started to diminish and it continued until 1985. during 1985-2030, there will be a constant rise and the percentage of Japan will be more than doubled. At the end of the period, Japan's proportion of the population will grow sharply (roughly tripled).
According to the graph, the percentage of the ratio of the population in Sweden and the USA calculated about 7 and 9 percent respectively and the proportion of both of them grew until 1980 (approximately 15%). However, the ratio of the USA will dramatically decline between 1980 and 2020 and then it will be reach more than 25%. Sweden experienced an upward trend with a minor fluctuation and the percentage of the population will more than 25%.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 56
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in theprotection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...od and they assumed to increase by 2040.Moreover, it assumed Japan and the USA swap thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...o diminish and it continued until 1985. during 1985-2030, there will be a constant ris...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76699029126 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76136372232 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2020929356 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141096036139 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644272046712 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838246400878 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107570337661 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941668121587 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.