A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b

People are calling in to question the manner of treating with the animals. While some advocate the idea that animal can be used by mankind without paying attention to their needs, others dismiss them as they are stating that animals have the same right as the human. Both of the ideas come with the rational reasons, which will be elaborated.

On one hand, some assert that using of the animal would be considered as a crucial action as they are living creatures just like humans. To begin with, they are emphasizing on the idea that animals have the same feeling as mankind have. Just they can not express these emotions. That is to say, doing an experiment on them, scientist maybe hurting them during the process and the animals can not express the pain they are going through. Individuals, furthermore, stating that the more people are using the animal’s products, more specifically their meats, the more violence they are likely to be. To put it differently, based on the research conducted by a research group at the University of Ohio, meat lovers act more aggressively than the ones who didn’t eat meats at all.

On the other hand, others put forward the argument that the usage of the animals is a must especially in the areas of the like research. The most compelling reason is that, if we are looking the big picture, the positive outcomes coming from the research on animals have far-reaching impact on both humans and animal’s lives. In other words, just by doing a simple experiment on a small creature like mouse, scientists might be revealing a part of science that was unknown to them before. Take the discovery of insulin as an example; hundreds of tests have been conducted on mice, finally, the real proportion of formula for insulin discovered. Millions and millions of lives, therefore, saved not only because of the experiment, but also due to the fact that animals allow the researchers to get the result faster and more reliable owing to a large amount of the test done on the animals first.

To conclude, there are logical points on both sides; however, I am of the opinion that there are more benefits accruing to people by using employing the animals especially for the research purpose. ​

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84375 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57921378525 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536458333333 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8056585211 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337579218041 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109893008355 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800051686033 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211432345397 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376486122855 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.